Ad is loading...
BAICX vs HCVCX
BAICX vs HCVCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs HCVCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.23B
Hartford Conservative Allocation C
Price$11.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.13M
BAICX vs HCVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. HCVCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Buy and HCVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. HCVCX (142M). BAICX pays higher dividends than HCVCX: BAICX (5.81) vs HCVCX (1.67). BAICX was incepted earlier than HCVCX: BAICX (17 years) vs HCVCX (21 years). HCVCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HCVCX (29.00). BAICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCVCX: BAICX (1000) vs HCVCX (2000). HCVCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: HCVCX (2000) vs BAICX (100). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. HCVCX (5.77). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 29.02 vs. HCVCX (15.69).
| BAICX | HCVCX | BAICX / HCVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.80 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.80 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.397 | 0.997 | 240% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 2000 | 5% |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 142M | 7,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.81 | 1.67 | 347% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 5.77 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 13.87 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.02 | 15.69 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.81 | 23.43 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers