BAK
Price
$9.03
Change
+$0.40 (+4.64%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
3 days until earnings call
SQM
Price
$47.68
Change
+$0.93 (+1.99%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions BAK vs SQM

Header iconBAK vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts BAK vs SQMBanner chart's image
Braskem SA
Price$9.03
Change+$0.40 (+4.64%)
Volume$251.37K
CapitalizationN/A
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$47.68
Change+$0.93 (+1.99%)
Volume$265.38K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BAK vs SQM Comparison Chart

Loading...

BAKDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SQMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BAK vs. SQM commentary
May 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAK is a Hold and SQM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2024
Stock price -- (BAK: $9.03 vs. SQM: $47.68)
Brand notoriety: BAK and SQM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAK: 78% vs. SQM: 68%
Market capitalization -- BAK: $4.13B vs. SQM: $13.99B
BAK [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.13B. SQM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $13.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SQM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SQM is a better buy in the long-term than BAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SQM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQM is a better buy in the short-term than BAK.

Price Growth

BAK (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.01% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +8.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAK is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

SQM is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.35% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BAK with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SQM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQM($14B) has a higher market cap than BAK($4.13B). BAK has higher P/E ratio than SQM: BAK (7.45) vs SQM (6.95). BAK YTD gains are higher at: 2.381 vs. SQM (-20.824). BAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.28B vs. SQM (2.94B). BAK has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. SQM (2.36B). SQM has less debt than BAK: SQM (4.49B) vs BAK (60B). BAK has higher revenues than SQM: BAK (72.9B) vs SQM (7.47B).
BAKSQMBAK / SQM
Capitalization4.13B14B29%
EBITDA3.28B2.94B112%
Gain YTD2.381-20.824-11%
P/E Ratio7.456.95107%
Revenue72.9B7.47B976%
Total Cash18.7B2.36B793%
Total Debt60B4.49B1,336%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAK vs SQM: Fundamental Ratings
BAK
SQM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
9724
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAK's Valuation (1) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (11) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAK (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAK’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's SMR Rating (24) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAK (97) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew significantly faster than BAK’s over the last 12 months.

BAK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (56) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

BAK's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (26) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAKSQM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAKDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SQMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLE26.920.60
+2.27%
Xtrackers S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
IDX16.310.20
+1.26%
VanEck Indonesia ETF
FIDI20.850.19
+0.92%
Fidelity International High Div ETF
FSMD37.560.31
+0.83%
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
ICOW31.950.25
+0.79%
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF

BAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAK has been loosely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAK jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAK
1D Price
Change %
BAK100%
+4.76%
KWR - BAK
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
SSL - BAK
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.60%
SQM - BAK
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
AVNT - BAK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
LYB - BAK
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

SQM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQM
1D Price
Change %
SQM100%
+2.10%
ALB - SQM
80%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
AVNT - SQM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CE - SQM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
ESI - SQM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
ASIX - SQM
46%
Loosely correlated
-14.06%
More