Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALPX vs HHCAX
BALPX vs HHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. HHCAX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Hold and HHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. HHCAX (86.5M). BALPX pays higher dividends than HHCAX: BALPX (4.11) vs HHCAX (0.23). BALPX was incepted earlier than HHCAX: BALPX (18 years) vs HHCAX (17 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than BALPX (1.60). HHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BALPX (32.00). HHCAX (6%) and BALPX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCAX: BALPX (1000) vs HHCAX (2500). HHCAX (6.10) and BALPX (6.06) have marching annual gain over last year. BALPX return over 5 years is better than : 14.92 vs. HHCAX (0.53).
| BALPX | HHCAX | BALPX / HHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.73 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 3.42 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.890 | 3.141 | 188% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 95% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 86.5M | 5,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 0.23 | 1,810% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 6.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.12 | 16.42 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.92 | 0.53 | 2,793% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.40 | 1.15 | 1,687% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement