Ad is loading...
BALPX vs HHCCX
BALPX vs HHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. HHCCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Buy and HHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.49B vs. HHCCX (94.9M). BALPX pays higher dividends than HHCCX: BALPX (1.40) vs HHCCX (0.00). BALPX was incepted earlier than HHCCX: BALPX (17 years) vs HHCCX (17 years). HHCCX (4.07) is less costly to investors than BALPX (1.60). HHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BALPX (32.00). BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCCX: BALPX (1000) vs HHCCX (2500). BALPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. HHCCX (0.94). BALPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.80 vs. HHCCX (4.23).
| BALPX | HHCCX | BALPX / HHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 3.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 4.07 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.893 | -1.199 | -158% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 94.9M | 4,732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 0.94 | 392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | 10.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.80 | 4.23 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.34 | -5.44 | 576% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...