Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALPX vs HHCZX
BALPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Buy and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. HHCZX (86.5M). BALPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BALPX (1.34) vs HHCZX (0.55). BALPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BALPX (18 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BALPX (1.60). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BALPX (32.00). BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCZX: BALPX (1000) vs HHCZX (2500). HHCZX (6.71) and BALPX (6.38) have marching annual gain over last year. BALPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.65 vs. HHCZX (4.85).
| BALPX | HHCZX | BALPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.38 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 3.07 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.215 | 4.689 | 133% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 86.5M | 5,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.55 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 6.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 19.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 4.85 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.10 | 5.01 | 381% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement