BAM
Price
$56.81
Change
+$1.27 (+2.29%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
CIXXF
Price
$23.24
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.32B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs CIXXF

Header iconBAM vs CIXXF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CIXXFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$56.81
Change+$1.27 (+2.29%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization16.34B
CI Financial
Price$23.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$354
Capitalization2.32B
BAM vs CIXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CIXXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and CIXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $56.81 vs. CIXXF: $23.24)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CIXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 55% vs. CIXXF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. CIXXF: $2.32B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. CIXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCIXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CIXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than CIXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIXXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CIXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXXF is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.07% price change this week, while CIXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

CIXXF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than CIXXF($2.32B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than CIXXF: BAM (37.12) vs CIXXF (15.72). CIXXF YTD gains are higher at: 7.942 vs. BAM (6.493). CIXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 673M vs. BAM (522M). CIXXF has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than CIXXF: BAM (256M) vs CIXXF (4.36B). CIXXF has higher revenues than BAM: CIXXF (2.44B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMCIXXFBAM / CIXXF
Capitalization16.3B2.32B702%
EBITDA522M673M78%
Gain YTD6.4937.94282%
P/E Ratio37.1215.72236%
Revenue383M2.44B16%
Total Cash9M174M5%
Total Debt256M4.36B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CIXXF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CIXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5451
SMR RATING
1..100
6096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9546

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CIXXF (41). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (54). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (96). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (45). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (39). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCIXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNAV27.310.58
+2.16%
Mohr Company Nav ETF
RAYE26.64-0.01
-0.04%
Rayliant Quantamental Emer Mkt Eq ETF
FXG64.40-0.10
-0.16%
First Trust Cnsmr Staples AlphaDEX® ETF
EWL54.90-0.37
-0.67%
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
BERZ5.75-0.17
-2.87%
MicroSectors™ St FANG&Inn 3X Inv Ld ETNs

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+2.29%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
BX - BAM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
KKR - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
STEP - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More

CIXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIXXF has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIXXF jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXXF
1D Price
Change %
CIXXF100%
N/A
BN - CIXXF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
BAM - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
VCTR - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
MAIN - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
APAM - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More