BAM
Price
$46.96
Change
-$0.33 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAX
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.18 (-1.61%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.76B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs PAX

BAM vs PAX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. PAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Buy and PAX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $47.29 vs. PAX: $11.21)
Brand notoriety: BAM and PAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 87% vs. PAX: 120%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $75.31B vs. PAX: $1.79B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $75.31B. PAX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than PAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($75.1B) has a higher market cap than PAX($1.76B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than PAX: BAM (30.31) vs PAX (21.15). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -7.849 vs. PAX (-27.654). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.46B vs. PAX (155M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. PAX (26.5M). PAX has less debt than BAM: PAX (171M) vs BAM (3.83B). BAM has higher revenues than PAX: BAM (4.77B) vs PAX (382M).
BAMPAXBAM / PAX
Capitalization75.1B1.76B4,267%
EBITDA3.46B155M2,231%
Gain YTD-7.849-27.65428%
P/E Ratio30.3121.15143%
Revenue4.77B382M1,249%
Total Cash1.1B26.5M4,136%
Total Debt3.83B171M2,237%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMPAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEN39.721.43
+3.73%
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
EQNR32.870.49
+1.51%
Equinor ASA
DOX51.690.22
+0.43%
Amdocs Limited
SST2.76-0.09
-3.16%
System1
CBNA37.10-3.37
-8.33%
Chain Bridge Bancorp Inc

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-0.32%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
ARES - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-2.66%
TPG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
More

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been loosely correlated with VINP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then VINP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-1.41%
VINP - PAX
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
BN - PAX
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
CG - PAX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
KKR - PAX
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
BAM - PAX
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More