Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs BKMBX
BAMBX vs BKMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. BKMBX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and BKMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX (7.57B) and BAMBX (7.56B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BKMBX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: BKMBX (4.07) vs BAMBX (3.75). BAMBX was incepted earlier than BKMBX: BAMBX (10 years) vs BKMBX (5 years). BAMBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BAMBX (242.00) and BKMBX (242.00) have comparable annual turnover. BAMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: BAMBX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. BAMBX (6.43).
| BAMBX | BKMBX | BAMBX / BKMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.82 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.82 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.676 | 2.874 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.56B | 7.57B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 4.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 6.86 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.74 | 18.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...