Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs CLAAX
BAMBX vs CLAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. CLAAX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and CLAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. CLAAX (502M). CLAAX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: CLAAX (8.03) vs BAMBX (3.74). BAMBX was incepted earlier than CLAAX: BAMBX (10 years) vs CLAAX (10 years). CLAAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.21). CLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 718.00 vs. BAMBX (242.00). CLAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than BAMBX (4%) vs BAMBX (4%). BAMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLAAX: BAMBX (1000) vs CLAAX (2000). BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. CLAAX (3.18). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.43 vs. CLAAX (15.37).
| BAMBX | CLAAX | BAMBX / CLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.34 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.47 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.676 | 1.345 | 199% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | 502M | 1,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 8.03 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 3.18 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.62 | 10.24 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 15.37 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -16.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...