Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs FAAAX
BAMBX vs FAAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. FAAAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and FAAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.64B vs. FAAAX (519M). FAAAX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FAAAX (6.04) vs BAMBX (3.74). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FAAAX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FAAAX (12 years). FAAAX (2.76) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.21). FAAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. BAMBX (242.00). FAAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than BAMBX (4%) vs BAMBX (4%). BAMBX (1000) and FAAAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. FAAAX (0.63). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.43 vs. FAAAX (8.44).
| BAMBX | FAAAX | BAMBX / FAAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.44 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.76 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.676 | 0.550 | 486% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 73% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 519M | 1,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 6.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 0.63 | 1,010% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 7.44 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 8.44 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...