Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FASCX
BAMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. FASCX (524M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FASCX (5.13) vs BAMBX (3.73). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. BAMBX (242.00). BAMBX (1000) and FASCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. FASCX (0.33). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.91 vs. FASCX (3.19).
| BAMBX | FASCX | BAMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.19 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 3.53 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.180 | 2.751 | 79% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 524M | 1,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 5.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 0.33 | 1,348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.19 | 9.88 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.91 | 3.19 | 499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.22 | 5.37 | 601% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement