BANC
Price
$13.75
Change
+$0.36 (+2.69%)
Updated
May 2, 02:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.29B
88 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$24.48
Change
+$0.52 (+2.17%)
Updated
May 2, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.1B
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BANC vs SBCF

Header iconBANC vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$13.75
Change+$0.36 (+2.69%)
Volume$999
Capitalization2.29B
Seacoast Banking
Price$24.48
Change+$0.52 (+2.17%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.1B
BANC vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. SBCF commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $13.39 vs. SBCF: $23.96)
Brand notoriety: BANC and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 76% vs. SBCF: 68%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. SBCF: $2.1B
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANC is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($2.29B) has a higher market cap than SBCF($2.1B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than BANC: SBCF (20.13) vs BANC (6.84). SBCF (-12.347) and BANC (-12.739) have similar YTD gains . SBCF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. BANC (45.9M). SBCF has less debt than BANC: SBCF (156M) vs BANC (3.85B). SBCF has higher revenues than BANC: SBCF (567M) vs BANC (278M).
BANCSBCFBANC / SBCF
Capitalization2.29B2.1B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.739-12.347103%
P/E Ratio6.8420.1334%
Revenue278M567M49%
Total Cash45.9M168M27%
Total Debt3.85B156M2,467%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1117
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5263
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANC's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (65). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (63). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (9). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (61). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (85). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OINCX22.49N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Income C
VSCVX25.15N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value A
LFVCX24.40N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value C
JHTAX18.44N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 A
VVJFX64.64N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Intl Sm Cp R6

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
-0.67%
TRMK - BANC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
COLB - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
SSB - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
UBSI - BANC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
ABCB - BANC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+1.05%
ABCB - SBCF
92%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
UBSI - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
SSB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
BHLB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
More