Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BASCX vs CFMOX
BASCX vs CFMOX Comparison
Open Charts BASCX vs CFMOX
Sterling Capital SC Interm Tax-Free A
Price$10.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.08M
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.23M
BASCX vs CFMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BASCX vs. CFMOX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BASCX is a Hold and CFMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. BASCX (21.1M). BASCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: BASCX (2.59) vs CFMOX (2.31). BASCX was incepted earlier than CFMOX: BASCX (28 years) vs CFMOX (30 years). BASCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). CFMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BASCX (19.81). BASCX (1000) and CFMOX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.56 vs. CFMOX (0.49). BASCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.14 vs. CFMOX (-1.45).
| BASCX | CFMOX | BASCX / CFMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.546 | 0.107 | 509% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 227M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.31 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 0.49 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.87 | 3.26 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.14 | -1.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.88 | 13.43 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers