Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BASCX vs CMBFX
BASCX vs CMBFX Comparison
Open Charts BASCX vs CMBFX
Sterling Capital SC Interm Tax-Free A
Price$10.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.08M
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.65M
BASCX vs CMBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BASCX vs. CMBFX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BASCX is a Hold and CMBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 285M vs. BASCX (21.1M). BASCX (2.59) and CMBFX (2.48) have matching dividends . BASCX was incepted earlier than CMBFX: BASCX (28 years) vs CMBFX (41 years). BASCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). BASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.81 vs. CMBFX (13.00). BASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: BASCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. BASCX (0.56). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.18 vs. BASCX (-1.14).
| BASCX | CMBFX | BASCX / CMBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.60 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.546 | 0.588 | 93% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 285M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 0.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.87 | 3.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.14 | -0.18 | 632% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.88 | 14.10 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers