Ad is loading...
BATT vs GNR
BATT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GNR
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.46
Change+$0.10 (+1.20%)
Volume$12.37K
Net Assets55.32M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$52.17
Change+$0.58 (+1.12%)
Volume$213.85K
Net Assets2.73B
BATT vs GNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GNR commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.73B vs. BATT (55.3M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GNR (4.843) vs BATT (-3.864). BATT was incepted earlier than GNR: BATT (7 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| BATT | GNR | BATT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | -3.864 | 4.843 | -80% |
| Net Assets | 55.3M | 2.73B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 15.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 3.39 | 4.57 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||