Ad is loading...
BATT vs HAP
BATT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs HAP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.48%)
Volume$19.52K
Net Assets56.55M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$49.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.82K
Net Assets152.6M
BATT vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. HAP commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and HAP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 153M vs. BATT (56.6M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: HAP (9.430) vs BATT (-5.000). BATT was incepted earlier than HAP: BATT (7 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover HAP (26.00) vs HAP (26.00).
| BATT | HAP | BATT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | -5.000 | 9.430 | -53% |
| Net Assets | 56.6M | 153M | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.43 | 137% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 26.00 | 162% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 2.43 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y