Ad is loading...
BATT vs HAP
BATT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs HAP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.24
Change+$0.17 (+2.11%)
Volume$500
Net Assets52.62M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$48.68
Change+$0.68 (+1.42%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets146.77M
BATT vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. HAP commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and HAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 147M vs. BATT (52.6M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: HAP (5.272) vs BATT (-8.295). BATT was incepted earlier than HAP: BATT (7 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover HAP (26.00) vs HAP (26.00).
| BATT | HAP | BATT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | -8.295 | 5.272 | -157% |
| Net Assets | 52.6M | 147M | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.43 | 137% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 26.00 | 162% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 2.43 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.67% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 74% Closely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 67% Closely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| TECK - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| E - HAP | 75% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||