Ad is loading...
BAWAX vs RGABX
BAWAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGABX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$49.29
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
BAWAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGABX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. BAWAX (8.44B). BAWAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BAWAX (1.01). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: BAWAX (100) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.45 vs. BAWAX (-0.69). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.73 vs. RGABX (35.95).
| BAWAX | RGABX | BAWAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.39 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.39 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.393 | -2.815 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.44B | 285B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | 1.45 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 28.15 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.73 | 35.95 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.59 | 48.42 | 449% |