Ad is loading...
BBCA vs GXG
BBCA vs GXG Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs GXG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$70.33
Change-$2.22 (-3.06%)
Volume$1.76K
CapitalizationN/A
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
Price$23.49
Change-$0.54 (-2.25%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
BBCA vs GXG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. GXG commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and GXG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 7.47B vs. GXG (35.7M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than GXG: BBCA (14.992) vs GXG (5.673). BBCA was incepted earlier than GXG: BBCA (6 years) vs GXG (16 years). GXG has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | GXG | BBCA / GXG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.992 | 5.673 | 264% |
| Net Assets | 7.47B | 35.7M | 20,936% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 50.35 | 6% |
| Yield | 2.44 | 6.48 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | GXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 24 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
GXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXG | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| GPRK - GXG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| TGLS - GXG | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
More | ||||