Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBH vs FMED
BBH vs FMED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBH vs. FMED commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBH is a Buy and FMED is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBH has more net assets: 341M vs. FMED (53.4M). BBH has a higher annual dividend yield than FMED: BBH (-0.714) vs FMED (-4.300). BBH was incepted earlier than FMED: BBH (14 years) vs FMED (5 years). BBH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FMED (0.50). FMED has a higher turnover BBH (19.00) vs BBH (19.00).
| BBH | FMED | BBH / FMED | |
| Gain YTD | -0.714 | -4.300 | 17% |
| Net Assets | 341M | 53.4M | 639% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.50 | 70% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 33.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 0.47 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBH | FMED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBH has been closely correlated with IQV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBH jumps, then IQV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBH | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| IQV - BBH | 77% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| AMGN - BBH | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| TECH - BBH | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| NTLA - BBH | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| REGN - BBH | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
FMED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMED has been loosely correlated with NTLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMED jumps, then NTLA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMED | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| NTLA - FMED | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| DNLI - FMED | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| TECH - FMED | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| TMO - FMED | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| TXG - FMED | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||