BBUC
Price
$21.49
Change
+$0.05 (+0.23%)
Updated
May 10, 6:59 PM EST
CNS
Price
$70.74
Change
-$2.99 (-4.06%)
Updated
May 10, 6:59 PM EST
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BBUC vs CNS

Header iconBBUC vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$21.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
Volume$12.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Cohen & Steers
Price$70.74
Change-$2.99 (-4.06%)
Volume$103.37K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BBUC vs CNS Comparison Chart

Loading...

BBUCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CNSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BBUC vs. CNS commentary
May 13, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongBuy and CNS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2024
Stock price -- (BBUC: $21.41 vs. CNS: $70.72)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 91% vs. CNS: 85%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $1.73B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.73B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than BBUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BBUC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CNS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.7B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($1.73B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than BBUC: CNS (28.73) vs BBUC (6.88). CNS YTD gains are higher at: -5.860 vs. BBUC (-7.780). BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. CNS (184M). BBUC has more cash in the bank: 787M vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than BBUC: CNS (140M) vs BBUC (9.14B). BBUC has higher revenues than CNS: BBUC (7.68B) vs CNS (490M).
BBUCCNSBBUC / CNS
Capitalization1.73B3.7B47%
EBITDA1.65B184M894%
Gain YTD-7.780-5.860133%
P/E Ratio6.8828.7324%
Revenue7.68B490M1,568%
Total Cash787M265M297%
Total Debt9.14B140M6,525%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBUCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CNSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMBJX38.480.20
+0.52%
Principal MidCap J
NOLVX20.970.05
+0.24%
Northern Large Cap Value
MMLRX14.940.03
+0.20%
MassMutual Select TRP Large Cap Blend I
ECIFX11.21N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced C
RSVAX26.29-0.02
-0.08%
Victory RS Value A

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with CNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then CNS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
-0.42%
CNS - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.28%
BEN - BBUC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
BN - BBUC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
BLK - BBUC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SEIC - BBUC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More