BBUS
Price
$139.50
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Aug 10, 03:56 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
9.21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$710.70
Change
-$0.01 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 10, 04:49 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.69T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUS vs VOO

BBUS vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 28, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • Both BBUS and VOO are low-cost, passively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) providing broad exposure to U.S. equities, making them suitable for core portfolio allocations.
  • BBUS tracks the Morningstar U.S. Target Market Exposure Index, targeting approximately 85% of the U.S. equity market by capitalization with around 546 holdings that include large- and mid-cap stocks.
  • VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index, focusing exclusively on 500 large-cap U.S. companies with a similar number of holdings but narrower market-cap coverage.
  • BBUS offers a lower expense ratio of 0.02% compared to VOO's 0.03%, providing a modest long-term cost advantage for buy-and-hold investors.
  • Top holdings in both ETFs are dominated by technology giants such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), resulting in comparable sector allocations skewed toward technology and growth-oriented industries.
  • BBUS provides slightly broader diversification through mid-cap exposure, while VOO offers concentrated large-cap liquidity and benchmark alignment with the widely followed S&P 500 Index.

Introduction

Investors seeking efficient, low-cost exposure to U.S. equities often compare broad-market ETFs like BBUS and VOO. These funds compete directly within the large-blend category, targeting similar investor goals of long-term capital appreciation through diversified equity ownership. While both deliver market-like returns with minimal active management, differences in index methodology, capitalization coverage, and expense structures create distinct positioning opportunities. In the current environment of evolving market leadership and emphasis on cost efficiency, understanding their structural variances helps investors align selections with portfolio construction needs and risk tolerances.

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) Overview

The JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is a passively managed fund issued by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It seeks to track the performance of the Morningstar U.S. Target Market Exposure Index, a free-float adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted benchmark that covers approximately 85% of the U.S. equity market. The index primarily includes large- and mid-cap companies. The ETF holds approximately 546 securities and maintains full replication where feasible. Top holdings typically feature NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL/GOOG). Sector allocations are concentrated in technology, followed by financials, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. The fund's expense ratio stands at 0.02%. As a standard equity ETF structure, it employs market-cap weighting with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment, offering broad yet cost-efficient U.S. equity exposure.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a passively managed fund issued by The Vanguard Group. It seeks to track the investment performance of the S&P 500 Index, a widely recognized benchmark of 500 leading large-cap U.S. companies. The ETF holds approximately 500-508 securities and employs full replication of the index. Top holdings mirror market leadership with significant weights in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Meta Platforms Inc. (META). Sector allocations emphasize technology, followed by healthcare, financials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.03%. Structured as a standard index ETF, it uses market-capitalization weighting with regular rebalancing to reflect index changes, delivering concentrated large-cap exposure aligned with a premier equity benchmark.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market, particularly large- and mid-cap segments, continues to be influenced by technological innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and corporate earnings growth in the technology and communication services sectors. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, inflation moderation, and fiscal policy developments shape capital flows into broad equity ETFs. Regulatory scrutiny around antitrust issues in technology and evolving trade dynamics introduce sector-specific risks. Both ETFs benefit from ongoing investor preference for passive strategies amid volatile market cycles, with capital continuing to flow toward low-cost vehicles that provide diversified access to U.S. corporate growth. Mid-cap inclusion in broader indices can enhance resilience during rotations away from mega-cap dominance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited strong correlation due to overlapping large-cap holdings, with performance driven by earnings momentum in technology leaders and broader economic expansion. BBUS has shown marginally higher volatility from mid-cap exposure, which can amplify gains during periods of economic recovery favoring smaller constituents within the 85% market-cap target. VOO has delivered benchmark-like consistency aligned with S&P 500 movements, benefiting from high liquidity during periods of market stress. Relative positioning favors BBUS for investors seeking incremental diversification beyond pure large-cap concentration, while VOO suits those prioritizing exact S&P 500 replication and established liquidity profiles. Cost differentials compound over longer horizons, supporting BBUS in extended holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs like BBUS and VOO can leverage the tool to explore related opportunities and refine portfolio strategies. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to BBUS. The lower expense ratio, broader market-cap coverage through mid-cap inclusion, and comparable diversification profile provide a slight edge in long-term cost efficiency and resilience across market regimes. While VOO offers excellent liquidity and precise S&P 500 alignment, the incremental benefits of BBUS in expense savings and expanded exposure tilt the probabilistic assessment in its favor for most core equity allocations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BBUS vs. VOO commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUS is a Buy and VOO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.69T vs. BBUS (9.21B). BBUS (13.695) and VOO (13.347) have matching annual dividend yield . BBUS was incepted earlier than VOO: BBUS (7 years) vs VOO (16 years). BBUS (0.02) has a lower expense ratio than VOO (0.03). BBUS has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
BBUSVOOBBUS / VOO
Gain YTD13.69513.347103%
Net Assets9.21B1.69T1%
Total Expense Ratio0.020.0367%
Turnover3.002.00150%
Yield1.011.0795%
Fund Existence7 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUSVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCA27.730.33
+1.20%
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF
GLCR24.660.20
+0.82%
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF
GEME42.450.32
+0.77%
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
GBF102.300.19
+0.19%
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF
UITB46.160.07
+0.16%
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF

BBUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUS has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUS jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUS
1D Price
Change %
BBUS100%
+0.63%
MSFT - BBUS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
AVGO - BBUS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
AAPL - BBUS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
AMZN - BBUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
META - BBUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More