BBUS
Price
$136.76
Change
-$0.83 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Net Assets
9.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$702.76
Change
+$6.11 (+0.88%)
Updated
Sep 11, 11:51 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.76T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUS vs VOO

BBUS vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • Both BBUS and VOO are low-cost, passive exchange-traded funds providing broad exposure to large- and mid-cap U.S. equities with highly similar sector allocations dominated by technology.
  • BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, covering approximately 85% of the U.S. equity market with around 469 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.02%.
  • VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index with approximately 507 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.03%, using full replication for precise index tracking.
  • Structural differences are modest: BBUS offers marginally broader mid-cap inclusion and lower costs, while VOO provides the liquidity and recognition of the S&P 500 benchmark.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, with technology, financial services, and communication services comprising the largest sector weights in both funds.
  • Investors seeking minimal costs and slightly wider market coverage may prefer BBUS, whereas those prioritizing S&P 500 purity and scale may favor VOO.

Introduction

Investors comparing core U.S. equity exposure frequently evaluate BBUS and VOO because both deliver diversified, market-cap-weighted access to the largest American companies at exceptionally low costs. These exchange-traded funds compete directly as passive vehicles targeting overlapping segments of the U.S. equity market. While their objectives align closely, differences in index construction, expense ratios, and holding counts create distinct positioning opportunities within a long-term portfolio. In the current environment of steady capital flows into broad equity benchmarks, understanding these structural nuances helps investors align selections with specific goals for cost efficiency, diversification, and benchmark fidelity.

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) Overview

The BBUS is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, a free-float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted benchmark covering approximately 85% of the U.S. equity market through large- and mid-cap securities. The fund holds approximately 469 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.02%. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, with sector allocations led by technology (approximately 37-38%), financial services (approximately 12-13%), and communication services. As an open-ended exchange-traded fund, BBUS employs a sampling methodology to replicate index performance efficiently. Its distinguishing features include one of the lowest expense ratios available for broad U.S. equity exposure and inclusion of select mid-cap names beyond pure large-cap benchmarks.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The VOO is a passively managed fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index, which comprises 500 of the largest U.S. companies selected for market capitalization, liquidity, and sector representation. The fund holds approximately 507 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.03%. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL, with sector allocations led by technology (approximately 37%), financial services, and communication services. As an open-ended exchange-traded fund, VOO uses full replication to hold every index constituent in proportion to its weighting. Its distinguishing features include exceptional liquidity from its substantial scale and precise alignment with the widely followed S&P 500 benchmark.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the broad U.S. large- and mid-cap equity segment, where technology remains the dominant sector driver amid ongoing innovation in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor demand. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate earnings growth, and capital allocation trends influence sector rotation between technology, financial services, and healthcare. Regulatory developments around antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms and evolving trade policies represent ongoing considerations. Capital continues to flow into low-cost passive vehicles, supporting liquidity across both strategies, while sector risks center on valuation concentration in a handful of mega-cap names and potential shifts in growth versus value leadership during different economic cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both BBUS and VOO have delivered closely aligned returns driven by the performance of shared large-cap technology holdings and broader equity market trends. Relative positioning reflects minor differences in mid-cap exposure, with BBUS occasionally benefiting from incremental diversification beyond the S&P 500 during periods of mid-cap outperformance. Volatility profiles remain comparable given the heavy overlap in holdings and sector weights. During earnings seasons or shifts in interest rate expectations, the funds have shown similar sensitivity to mega-cap technology results, with cost advantages and index breadth providing subtle edges in specific environments over extended periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into BBUS, VOO, or similar vehicles may explore the platform for additional screening capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to BBUS due to its lower expense ratio, slightly broader market coverage through mid-cap inclusion, and competitive diversification profile. Both funds demonstrate strong cost efficiency and trend consistency within the large-cap equity space; however, the marginal advantages in fees and index scope tilt the balance toward BBUS for long-term core holdings while acknowledging VOO’s superior liquidity and benchmark recognition.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BBUS vs. VOO commentary
Sep 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUS is a Hold and VOO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.76T vs. BBUS (9.17B). BBUS (11.462) and VOO (11.104) have matching annual dividend yield . BBUS was incepted earlier than VOO: BBUS (8 years) vs VOO (16 years). BBUS (0.02) has a lower expense ratio than VOO (0.03). BBUS has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
BBUSVOOBBUS / VOO
Gain YTD11.46211.104103%
Net Assets9.17B1.76T1%
Total Expense Ratio0.020.0367%
Turnover3.002.00150%
Yield0.991.0495%
Fund Existence8 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUSVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BBUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CARD2.450.04
+1.45%
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN
TMFX23.41-0.12
-0.50%
Motley Fool Next ETF
PSC67.76-0.43
-0.63%
Principal US Small Cap ETF
IBND30.69-0.22
-0.72%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Intl CorpBdETF
PBD17.37-0.37
-2.09%
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

BBUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUS has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUS jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUS
1D Price
Change %
BBUS100%
-0.60%
MSFT - BBUS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AVGO - BBUS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
AAPL - BBUS
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
AMZN - BBUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
META - BBUS
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
More