BC
Price
$54.73
Change
+$1.63 (+3.07%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
49 days until earnings call
MCFT
Price
$17.51
Change
+$0.04 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jun 5, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.04M
84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BC vs MCFT

Header iconBC vs MCFT Comparison
Open Charts BC vs MCFTBanner chart's image
Brunswick
Price$54.73
Change+$1.63 (+3.07%)
Volume$2M
Capitalization6.51B
MasterCraft Boat Holdings
Price$17.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
Volume$111
Capitalization404.04M
BC vs MCFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BC vs. MCFT commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BC is a StrongBuy and MCFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BC: $54.73 vs. MCFT: $17.47)
Brand notoriety: BC: Not notable vs. MCFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BC: 166% vs. MCFT: 94%
Market capitalization -- BC: $6.51B vs. MCFT: $404.04M
BC [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.51B. MCFT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $404.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the long-term than MCFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the short-term than MCFT.

Price Growth

BC (@Recreational Products) experienced а +8.85% price change this week, while MCFT (@Recreational Products) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MCFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.94% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BC($6.51B) has a higher market cap than MCFT($404M). BC has higher P/E ratio than MCFT: BC (15.64) vs MCFT (7.14). MCFT YTD gains are higher at: -8.390 vs. BC (-14.089). BC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. MCFT (90M). BC has more cash in the bank: 469M vs. MCFT (109M). MCFT has less debt than BC: MCFT (51.4M) vs BC (2.59B). BC has higher revenues than MCFT: BC (6.4B) vs MCFT (537M).
BCMCFTBC / MCFT
Capitalization6.51B404M1,612%
EBITDA1.01B90M1,127%
Gain YTD-14.089-8.390168%
P/E Ratio15.647.14219%
Revenue6.4B537M1,192%
Total Cash469M109M430%
Total Debt2.59B51.4M5,045%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BC vs MCFT: Fundamental Ratings
BC
MCFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8371
SMR RATING
1..100
8490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BC's Valuation (27) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCFT (90). This means that BC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

MCFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (83). This means that MCFT’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's SMR Rating (84) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MCFT (90). This means that BC’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

BC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MCFT (61). This means that BC’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

MCFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (5). This means that MCFT’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCMCFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIUX11.22N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund R5
CBSAX24.63N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund A
FTASX28.46N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
REACX26.33N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate Inv
GEBIX10.70N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq Inst

BC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BC has been closely correlated with PII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BC jumps, then PII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BC
1D Price
Change %
BC100%
+3.07%
PII - BC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
LCII - BC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
MBUU - BC
79%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
WGO - BC
75%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
HOG - BC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
More

MCFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCFT has been closely correlated with MBUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCFT jumps, then MBUU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFT
1D Price
Change %
MCFT100%
+2.95%
MBUU - MCFT
71%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
BC - MCFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
WGO - MCFT
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
MPX - MCFT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
LCII - MCFT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More