Advertisement
BCC vs BFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Buy and BFS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
BFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (+0.04% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.74% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| BCC | BFS | BCC / BFS | |
| Capitalization | 6.07B | 912M | 665% |
| EBITDA | 806M | 165M | 488% |
| Gain YTD | -25.308 | -6.965 | 363% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.62 | 21.97 | 57% |
| Revenue | 6.84B | 257M | 2,661% |
| Total Cash | 950M | 8.41M | 11,300% |
| Total Debt | 530M | 1.39B | 38% |
BCC | BFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 1 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCC's Valuation (17) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFS (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFS’s over the last 12 months.
BCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as BFS (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's SMR Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BCC (55) in the Forest Products industry. This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BCC (63) in the Forest Products industry. This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BCC (45) in the Forest Products industry. This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.
| BCC | BFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 21 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
BFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with UE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then UE could also see price increases.