Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCICX vs FHLKX
BCICX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BCICX vs FHLKX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor C
Price$10.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.44B
Fidelity Health Savings K
Price$10.70
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.14M
BCICX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCICX vs. FHLKX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCICX is a Buy and FHLKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCICX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. FHLKX (64.1M). BCICX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BCICX (4.92) vs FHLKX (2.82). BCICX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BCICX (17 years) vs FHLKX (5 years). BCICX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.39). BCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLKX (28.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCICX: FHLKX (0) vs BCICX (1000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. BCICX (8.15). BCICX return over 5 years is better than : 23.64 vs. FHLKX (19.08).
| BCICX | FHLKX | BCICX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.39 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.39 | 433% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.021 | 6.710 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 64.1M | 16,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.92 | 2.82 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 8.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.84 | 23.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.64 | 19.08 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement