BCII vs CDBT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCII is a Hold and CDBT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCII’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CDBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCII’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDBT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CDBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
BCII (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +15.34% price change this week, while CDBT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.82% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| BCII | CDBT | BCII / CDBT | |
| Capitalization | 17.1M | 3.6M | 475% |
| EBITDA | -7.54M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.375 | 108.333 | 13% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.09M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 2.68M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 350K | N/A | - |
BCII | CDBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDBT's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BCII (66). This means that CDBT’s stock grew similarly to BCII’s over the last 12 months.
CDBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCII (100). This means that CDBT’s stock grew similarly to BCII’s over the last 12 months.
CDBT's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCII (100). This means that CDBT’s stock grew similarly to BCII’s over the last 12 months.
BCII's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBT (45). This means that BCII’s stock grew similarly to CDBT’s over the last 12 months.
BCII's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBT (100). This means that BCII’s stock grew similarly to CDBT’s over the last 12 months.
| BCII | CDBT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
BCII and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCII and ELLH have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCII and ELLH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCII | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCII | 100% | -13.58% | ||
| ELLH - BCII | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DHCC - BCII | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLYQ - BCII | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDBT - BCII | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BQST - BCII | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CDBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDBT has been loosely correlated with SVIIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDBT jumps, then SVIIU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDBT | 100% | N/A | ||
| SVIIU - CDBT | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FCIC - CDBT | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NGRC - CDBT | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCVI - CDBT | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BOREF - CDBT | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||