BCOW vs ECBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCOW is a Buy and ECBK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileECBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ECBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BCOW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while ECBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCOW is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.
ECBK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BCOW | ECBK | BCOW / ECBK | |
| Capitalization | 41.7M | 120M | 35% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.897 | 5.892 | 473% |
| P/E Ratio | 1000.00 | 24.90 | 4,015% |
| Revenue | 12.8M | 26.7M | 48% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 78.5M | 224M | 35% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCOW has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCOW jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCOW | 100% | +2.76% | ||
| SBNY - BCOW | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| ECBK - BCOW | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RBB - BCOW | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| CLST - BCOW | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| SMBC - BCOW | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
ECBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECBK has been loosely correlated with BCOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECBK jumps, then BCOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECBK | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| BCOW - ECBK | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| NEWT - ECBK | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
| FFIC - ECBK | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.51% | ||
| LCNB - ECBK | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| CADE - ECBK | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.97% | ||
More | ||||