BCOW
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.50 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
41.67M
ISBA
Price
$25.99
Change
+$0.49 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
154.14M
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCOW vs ISBA

Header iconBCOW vs ISBA Comparison
Open Charts BCOW vs ISBABanner chart's image
1895 Bancorp of Wisconsin
Price$9.50
Change-$0.50 (-5.00%)
Volume$3.72K
Capitalization41.67M
Isabella Bank
Price$25.99
Change+$0.49 (+1.92%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization154.14M
BCOW vs ISBA Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCOW vs. ISBA commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCOW is a Hold and ISBA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BCOW: $9.50 vs. ISBA: $25.99)
Brand notoriety: BCOW and ISBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCOW: 57% vs. ISBA: 40%
Market capitalization -- BCOW: $41.67M vs. ISBA: $154.14M
BCOW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.67M. ISBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $154.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileISBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ISBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the long-term than BCOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCOW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISBA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCOW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ISBA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the short-term than BCOW.

Price Growth

BCOW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while ISBA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCOW is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

ISBA is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISBA($154M) has a higher market cap than BCOW($41.7M). BCOW has higher P/E ratio than ISBA: BCOW (1000.00) vs ISBA (7.11). ISBA YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BCOW (-5.000). BCOW has less debt than ISBA: BCOW (78.5M) vs ISBA (84.3M). ISBA has higher revenues than BCOW: ISBA (72.7M) vs BCOW (12.8M).
BCOWISBABCOW / ISBA
Capitalization41.7M154M27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.0000.000-
P/E Ratio1000.007.1114,060%
Revenue12.8M72.7M18%
Total CashN/A22M-
Total Debt78.5M84.3M93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCOW vs ISBA: Fundamental Ratings
BCOW
ISBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
9050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ISBA's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCOW (93). This means that ISBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCOW’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCOW (100). This means that ISBA’s stock grew significantly faster than BCOW’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCOW (90). This means that ISBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCOW’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BCOW (52). This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to BCOW’s over the last 12 months.

BCOW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ISBA (13). This means that BCOW’s stock grew similarly to ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCOWISBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LANV1.990.21
+11.80%
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
SHOO41.120.32
+0.78%
Steven Madden Ltd
DESP19.180.04
+0.21%
Despegar.com Corp
EQT52.96-0.82
-1.52%
EQT Corp
AEON0.15-0.02
-9.89%
AEON Biopharma

BCOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCOW has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCOW jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCOW
1D Price
Change %
BCOW100%
-5.00%
SBNY - BCOW
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
ECBK - BCOW
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
CLST - BCOW
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
SMBC - BCOW
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
FFWM - BCOW
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
More

ISBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISBA and PMHG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISBA and PMHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISBA
1D Price
Change %
ISBA100%
+1.92%
PMHG - ISBA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBAF - ISBA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
NKSH - ISBA
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
BCOW - ISBA
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
DNBBY - ISBA
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More