BCOW
Price
$8.95
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Sep 16, 12:29 PM (EDT)
SMBC
Price
$55.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 16, 10:12 AM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCOW vs SMBC

Header iconBCOW vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts BCOW vs SMBCBanner chart's image
1895 Bancorp of Wisconsin
Price$8.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$55.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$558
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BCOW vs SMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BCOW vs. SMBC commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCOW is a Buy and SMBC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (BCOW: $8.94 vs. SMBC: $55.20)
Brand notoriety: BCOW and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCOW: 395% vs. SMBC: 81%
Market capitalization -- BCOW: $41.67M vs. SMBC: $497.01M
BCOW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.67M. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $497.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBC is a better buy in the long-term than BCOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BCOW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCOW is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBC($497M) has a higher market cap than BCOW($41.7M). BCOW has higher P/E ratio than SMBC: BCOW (1000.00) vs SMBC (11.19). BCOW YTD gains are higher at: 27.897 vs. SMBC (4.905). BCOW has less debt than SMBC: BCOW (78.5M) vs SMBC (136M). SMBC has higher revenues than BCOW: SMBC (167M) vs BCOW (12.8M).
BCOWSMBCBCOW / SMBC
Capitalization41.7M497M8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.8974.905569%
P/E Ratio1000.0011.198,934%
Revenue12.8M167M8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt78.5M136M58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKUQX24.120.35
+1.47%
Franklin Utilities A
RPEAX42.060.33
+0.79%
Davis Opportunity A
MYIIX8.050.03
+0.37%
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl I
CNGLX21.070.07
+0.33%
Commonwealth Global
BIFRX19.74N/A
N/A
BlackRock International R

BCOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCOW has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCOW jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCOW
1D Price
Change %
BCOW100%
+2.76%
SBNY - BCOW
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
ECBK - BCOW
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
RBB - BCOW
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
CLST - BCOW
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SMBC - BCOW
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
More