Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGEBX
BDAFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGEBX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$31.58
Change-$0.10 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.56M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.11
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
BDAFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. BDAFX (511M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: BDAFX (0.01) vs RGEBX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) and BDAFX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGEBX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.11 vs. RGEBX (20.79). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 121.80 vs. RGEBX (38.92).
| BDAFX | RGEBX | BDAFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.09 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.09 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.181 | 12.136 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.11 | 20.79 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.82 | 43.03 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.80 | 38.92 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement