BDIMF
Price
$8.85
Change
-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
281.73M
BRLGF
Price
$6.28
Change
-$0.07 (-1.10%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
112.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDIMF vs BRLGF

Header iconBDIMF vs BRLGF Comparison
Open Charts BDIMF vs BRLGFBanner chart's image
Black Diamond Group
Price$8.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Volume$4.32K
Capitalization281.73M
DOMINION LENDING CTRS
Price$6.28
Change-$0.07 (-1.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization112.79M
BDIMF vs BRLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDIMF vs. BRLGF commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDIMF is a StrongBuy and BRLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BDIMF: $8.85 vs. BRLGF: $6.35)
Brand notoriety: BDIMF and BRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDIMF: 542% vs. BRLGF: 61%
Market capitalization -- BDIMF: $281.73M vs. BRLGF: $112.79M
BDIMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $281.73M. BRLGF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $112.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDIMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBRLGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDIMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDIMF and BRLGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDIMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDIMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the short-term than BRLGF.

Price Growth

BDIMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while BRLGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDIMF($282M) has a higher market cap than BRLGF($113M). BRLGF has higher P/E ratio than BDIMF: BRLGF (3275.64) vs BDIMF (14.22). BDIMF YTD gains are higher at: 35.296 vs. BRLGF (11.744). BDIMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 85.7M vs. BRLGF (25.7M). BDIMF has more cash in the bank: 6.53M vs. BRLGF (5.61M). BRLGF has less debt than BDIMF: BRLGF (41.7M) vs BDIMF (238M). BDIMF has higher revenues than BRLGF: BDIMF (336M) vs BRLGF (62.5M).
BDIMFBRLGFBDIMF / BRLGF
Capitalization282M113M250%
EBITDA85.7M25.7M333%
Gain YTD35.29611.744301%
P/E Ratio14.223275.640%
Revenue336M62.5M538%
Total Cash6.53M5.61M116%
Total Debt238M41.7M571%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDIMF vs BRLGF: Fundamental Ratings
BDIMF
BRLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8892
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
511
SMR RATING
1..100
6998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRLGF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDIMF (87). This means that BRLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (11). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (98). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (39). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRLGF (100). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew significantly faster than BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDIMFBRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNHPF11.920.27
+2.32%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.
CLSH0.04N/A
N/A
CLS Holdings USA, Inc.
GFLT10.44N/A
N/A
GenFlat Holdings, Inc.
SGHIF1.57N/A
N/A
Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd.
SMGZY31.07-0.42
-1.33%
Smiths Group Plc

BDIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDIMF and R have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDIMF and R's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDIMF
1D Price
Change %
BDIMF100%
N/A
R - BDIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
AXP - BDIMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
RKT - BDIMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.98%
ASHTY - BDIMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
ASHTF - BDIMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More

BRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLGF and FCMGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLGF and FCMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLGF
1D Price
Change %
BRLGF100%
-1.07%
FCMGF - BRLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBCRF - BRLGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRRAY - BRLGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDIMF - BRLGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPRF - BRLGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More