BDIMF
Price
$6.42
Change
-$0.08 (-1.23%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
281.73M
RKT
Price
$11.87
Change
+$0.13 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BDIMF vs RKT

Header iconBDIMF vs RKT Comparison
Open Charts BDIMF vs RKTBanner chart's image
Black Diamond Group
Price$6.42
Change-$0.08 (-1.23%)
Volume$10.12K
Capitalization281.73M
Rocket Companies
Price$11.87
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
Volume$3.05M
Capitalization1.99B
BDIMF vs RKT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDIMF vs. RKT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDIMF is a Hold and RKT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BDIMF: $6.43 vs. RKT: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: BDIMF and RKT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDIMF: 11% vs. RKT: 89%
Market capitalization -- BDIMF: $281.73M vs. RKT: $1.99B
BDIMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $281.73M. RKT’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDIMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRKT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDIMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RKT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the long-term than RKT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDIMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RKT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDIMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RKT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RKT is a better buy in the short-term than BDIMF.

Price Growth

BDIMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RKT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +15.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

RKT is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.15% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKT($1.99B) has a higher market cap than BDIMF($282M). RKT has higher P/E ratio than BDIMF: RKT (30.21) vs BDIMF (14.22). RKT YTD gains are higher at: 5.417 vs. BDIMF (-1.776). BDIMF has less debt than RKT: BDIMF (238M) vs RKT (5.25B). RKT has higher revenues than BDIMF: RKT (3.65B) vs BDIMF (336M).
BDIMFRKTBDIMF / RKT
Capitalization282M1.99B14%
EBITDA85.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.7765.417-33%
P/E Ratio14.2230.2147%
Revenue336M3.65B9%
Total Cash6.53MN/A-
Total Debt238M5.25B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDIMF: Fundamental Ratings
BDIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDIMFRKT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCTY16.770.84
+5.27%
The9 Limited
AVT53.560.71
+1.34%
Avnet
TG7.940.04
+0.51%
Tredegar Corp
BKR46.540.21
+0.45%
Baker Hughes Company
KRP15.95-0.03
-0.19%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP

BDIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDIMF and R have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDIMF and R's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDIMF
1D Price
Change %
BDIMF100%
N/A
R - BDIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
AXP - BDIMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
HEES - BDIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
RKT - BDIMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
ASHTY - BDIMF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
More

RKT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKT has been closely correlated with UWMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RKT jumps, then UWMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKT
1D Price
Change %
RKT100%
+1.11%
UWMC - RKT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
PFSI - RKT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
WD - RKT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
LC - RKT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
COOP - RKT
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
More