It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDULF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRHE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDULF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RHE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BDULF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RHE (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -7.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.41%.
RHE is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2024.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
BDULF | RHE | BDULF / RHE | |
Capitalization | 13.3B | 4.71M | 282,498% |
EBITDA | 22.9B | -831K | -2,755,716% |
Gain YTD | 4.532 | -25.075 | -18% |
P/E Ratio | 36.23 | 0.13 | 27,029% |
Revenue | 93B | 22.8M | 407,895% |
Total Cash | 17.8B | 1.43M | 1,247,372% |
Total Debt | 22.2B | 54.3M | 40,884% |
BDULF | RHE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDULF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as RHE (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BDULF’s stock grew similarly to RHE’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RHE (97) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BDULF’s stock grew similarly to RHE’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHE (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BDULF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHE’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHE (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BDULF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHE’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as RHE (94) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BDULF’s stock grew similarly to RHE’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF | RHE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago21% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago17% | 1 day ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago25% | 3 days ago89% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MPEYX | 10.18 | N/A | N/A |
MassMutual Strat Emerg Mkts Svc | |||
JOEIX | 11.62 | N/A | N/A |
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Advisor | |||
IHORX | 19.31 | N/A | N/A |
Hartford International Opportunities R3 | |||
MCGCX | 18.23 | -0.51 | -2.72% |
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor C | |||
VEXAX | 144.89 | -6.67 | -4.40% |
Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDULF and MD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDULF and MD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BDULF | 100% | N/A | ||
MD - BDULF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
PIII - BDULF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
NUMIF - BDULF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
RHE - BDULF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
INNV - BDULF | 5% Poorly correlated | -8.09% | ||
More |