It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOTEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OTEX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BEAT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while OTEX (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.
BEAT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
OTEX is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BEAT | OTEX | BEAT / OTEX | |
Capitalization | 57.1M | 10.3B | 1% |
EBITDA | -15.31M | 1.56B | -1% |
Gain YTD | -6.957 | -1.907 | 365% |
P/E Ratio | 149.25 | 80.04 | 186% |
Revenue | 0 | 5.7B | - |
Total Cash | 16.2M | 1B | 2% |
Total Debt | 5.42M | 8.84B | 0% |
BEAT | OTEX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OTEX's Valuation (5) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEAT (83) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that OTEX’s stock grew significantly faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
OTEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BEAT (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that OTEX’s stock grew similarly to BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
OTEX's SMR Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEAT (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that OTEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
OTEX's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BEAT (62) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that OTEX’s stock grew similarly to BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
BEAT's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for OTEX (96) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BEAT’s stock grew significantly faster than OTEX’s over the last 12 months.
BEAT | OTEX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago88% | 12 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago76% | 12 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago89% | 12 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago90% | 12 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago86% | 14 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago86% | 12 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago85% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
XPND | 30.88 | 0.39 | +1.28% |
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF | |||
IXUS | 66.79 | 0.39 | +0.59% |
iShares Core MSCI Total Intl Stk ETF | |||
YLD | 19.39 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
Principal Active High Yield ETF | |||
PSMO | 27.83 | N/A | N/A |
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF | |||
RAVI | 75.35 | N/A | -0.01% |
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEAT and DSGX have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEAT and DSGX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BEAT | 100% | N/A | ||
DSGX - BEAT | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
LIQQF - BEAT | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PDFS - BEAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
LYT - BEAT | 27% Poorly correlated | +11.80% | ||
OTEX - BEAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
More |