Ad is loading...
BEMCX vs RNWFX
BEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWFX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$8.18
Change+$0.44 (+5.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.43M
American Funds New World R5
Price$74.56
Change+$3.88 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.72B
BEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 58.7B vs. BEMCX (569M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BEMCX (2.01) vs RNWFX (1.17). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (27.76). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.44 vs. RNWFX (-10.37). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.25 vs. RNWFX (26.34).
| BEMCX | RNWFX | BEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.62 | 335% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.62 | 335% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.747 | -8.517 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 58.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.17 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.44 | -10.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.82 | -4.49 | -241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.25 | 26.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.44 | 27.87 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...