BEN
Price
$32.49
Change
+$0.20 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHI
Price
$57.92
Change
+$0.61 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs FHI

BEN vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEN vs. FHI commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and FHI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (BEN: $32.49 vs. FHI: $57.92)
Brand notoriety: BEN and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 51% vs. FHI: 68%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $16.88B vs. FHI: $4.4B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.88B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than BEN.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEN($16.9B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.4B). BEN has higher P/E ratio than FHI: BEN (24.80) vs FHI (11.25). BEN YTD gains are higher at: 39.371 vs. FHI (12.751). BEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. FHI (576M). FHI has more cash in the bank: 645M vs. BEN (276M). FHI has less debt than BEN: FHI (451M) vs BEN (15.4B). BEN has higher revenues than FHI: BEN (9.03B) vs FHI (1.86B).
BENFHIBEN / FHI
Capitalization16.9B4.4B384%
EBITDA1.83B576M318%
Gain YTD39.37112.751309%
P/E Ratio24.8011.25221%
Revenue9.03B1.86B487%
Total Cash276M645M43%
Total Debt15.4B451M3,415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs FHI: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8178
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7115
SMR RATING
1..100
8531
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (10) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FHI (81) in the null industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew significantly faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (71) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (85) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (47) in the null industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BEN (82) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to BEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSM14.650.09
+0.62%
Black Stone Minerals LP
SQM68.73-0.59
-0.85%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
BWMX16.73-0.58
-3.35%
Betterware de Mexico SAPI de CV
BDTX1.76-0.08
-4.35%
Black Diamond Therapeutics
WBUY0.85-0.27
-24.18%
Webuy Global Ltd

BEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been closely correlated with AMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then AMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEN
1D Price
Change %
BEN100%
+0.62%
AMP - BEN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
BAM - BEN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
IVZ - BEN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
PFG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
CG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
More