It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BEP (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while NEP (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.
BEP is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
NEP is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
BEP | NEP | BEP / NEP | |
Capitalization | 6.68B | 2.77B | 241% |
EBITDA | 4.05B | 772M | 524% |
Gain YTD | -5.334 | -33.179 | 16% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 87.12 | - |
Revenue | 5.04B | 1.08B | 467% |
Total Cash | 1.09B | 274M | 397% |
Total Debt | 30.5B | 6.29B | 485% |
BEP | NEP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEP's Valuation (3) in the Alternative Power Generation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEP (38) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that NEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEP’s over the last 12 months.
BEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NEP (100) in the Alternative Power Generation industry. This means that BEP’s stock grew similarly to NEP’s over the last 12 months.
NEP's SMR Rating (80) in the Alternative Power Generation industry is in the same range as BEP (91) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that NEP’s stock grew similarly to BEP’s over the last 12 months.
NEP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Alternative Power Generation industry is in the same range as BEP (73) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that NEP’s stock grew similarly to BEP’s over the last 12 months.
BEP's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEP (98) in the Alternative Power Generation industry. This means that BEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEP’s over the last 12 months.
BEP | NEP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago60% | 9 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago67% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago47% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEP has been loosely correlated with CWEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEP jumps, then CWEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NEP | 100% | -1.18% | ||
CWEN - NEP | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
ORA - NEP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
BEP - NEP | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
BEPC - NEP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
AQN - NEP | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
More |