Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEXFX vs RNWHX
BEXFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEXFX vs RNWHX
Baron Emerging Markets Retail
Price$16.99
Change+$0.07 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.71B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$85.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
BEXFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEXFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEXFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. BEXFX (3.71B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than BEXFX: RNWHX (1.04) vs BEXFX (0.47). BEXFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEXFX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEXFX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). BEXFX (37.00) and RNWHX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEXFX: RNWHX (250) vs BEXFX (2000). BEXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.30 vs. RNWHX (7.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. BEXFX (28.39).
| BEXFX | RNWHX | BEXFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.72 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.72 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.405 | 11.865 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 67.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.30 | 7.68 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.72 | 23.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 30.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers