Ad is loading...
BEXFX vs RNWHX
BEXFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEXFX vs RNWHX
Baron Emerging Markets Retail
Price$15.65
Change+$0.20 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.59B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.98
Change+$1.06 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.7B
BEXFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEXFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEXFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 60.7B vs. BEXFX (3.59B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than BEXFX: RNWHX (1.12) vs BEXFX (0.50). BEXFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEXFX (14 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). BEXFX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEXFX (33.37). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEXFX: RNWHX (250) vs BEXFX (2000). BEXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. RNWHX (0.40). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 36.18 vs. BEXFX (33.10).
| BEXFX | RNWHX | BEXFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.72 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.72 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.078 | -0.132 | -1,580% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 60.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.12 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 0.40 | 2,079% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 9.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.10 | 36.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers