BFACF vs EONR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFACF is a Hold and EONR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFACF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BFACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EONR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EONR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
BFACF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.93% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| BFACF | EONR | BFACF / EONR | |
| Capitalization | 152M | 15.5M | 981% |
| EBITDA | -3.43M | 13.3K | -25,792% |
| Gain YTD | -1.487 | -24.006 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.83 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 112K | 639K | 18% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.52M | - |
| EONR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
BFACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BFACF and GDST have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFACF and GDST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GDST - BFACF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLST - BFACF | 27% Poorly correlated | -19.63% | ||
| ZAPP - BFACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| DECA - BFACF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMLTF - BFACF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||