BFACF
Price
$11.26
Change
-$0.34 (-2.93%)
Updated
Feb 18 closing price
Capitalization
151.75M
GLST
Price
$6.47
Change
-$1.58 (-19.63%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
86.34M
Ad is loading...

BFACF vs GLST

Header iconBFACF vs GLST Comparison
Open Charts BFACF vs GLSTBanner chart's image
Battery Future Acquisition
Price$11.26
Change-$0.34 (-2.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization151.75M
Global Star Acquisition
Price$6.47
Change-$1.58 (-19.63%)
Volume$9.16K
Capitalization86.34M
BFACF vs GLST Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFACF vs. GLST commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFACF is a Hold and GLST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BFACF: $11.26 vs. GLST: $6.47)
Brand notoriety: BFACF and GLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFACF: 0% vs. GLST: 108%
Market capitalization -- BFACF: $151.75M vs. GLST: $86.34M
BFACF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $151.75M. GLST’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $86.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFACF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLST is a better buy in the long-term than BFACF.

Price Growth

BFACF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while GLST (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -41.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLST is expected to report earnings on Dec 07, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFACF($152M) has a higher market cap than GLST($86.3M). GLST has higher P/E ratio than BFACF: GLST (107.20) vs BFACF (45.83). BFACF YTD gains are higher at: -1.487 vs. GLST (-46.083). GLST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.13M vs. BFACF (-3.43M). GLST has more cash in the bank: 1.51M vs. BFACF (112K). BFACF (0) and GLST (0) have equivalent revenues.
BFACFGLSTBFACF / GLST
Capitalization152M86.3M176%
EBITDA-3.43M-2.13M161%
Gain YTD-1.487-46.0833%
P/E Ratio45.83107.2043%
Revenue00-
Total Cash112K1.51M7%
Total DebtN/A1.59M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSBFX22.61-0.21
-0.92%
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
REIGX15.30-0.15
-0.97%
Federated Hermes International Growth R6
GLCCX20.49-0.49
-2.34%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
DMCFX27.64-1.04
-3.63%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R5
OEPIX82.87-4.05
-4.66%
Oil Equipment&Svcs UltraSector Pro Inv

BFACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFACF and GDST have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFACF and GDST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFACF
1D Price
Change %
BFACF100%
N/A
GDST - BFACF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLST - BFACF
27%
Poorly correlated
-19.63%
ZAPP - BFACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
DECA - BFACF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMLTF - BFACF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLST has been loosely correlated with GLSTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLST jumps, then GLSTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLST
1D Price
Change %
GLST100%
-19.63%
GLSTU - GLST
44%
Loosely correlated
-21.79%
AIMAU - GLST
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRC - GLST
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDST - GLST
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FGMC - GLST
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More