BFAM vs SCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a StrongBuy and SCI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFAM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while SCI (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -1.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFAM is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
SCI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-2.04% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| BFAM | SCI | BFAM / SCI | |
| Capitalization | 6.52B | 10.9B | 60% |
| EBITDA | 282M | 1.26B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | 3.654 | -3.708 | -99% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.88 | 20.78 | 423% |
| Revenue | 2.42B | 4.1B | 59% |
| Total Cash | 93.6M | 222M | 42% |
| Total Debt | 1.86B | 4.8B | 39% |
BFAM | SCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCI's Valuation (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's SMR Rating (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
BFAM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as SCI (54) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (70) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
| BFAM | SCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 67% | 17 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 8 days ago 44% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQE | 90.15 | 0.59 | +0.66% |
| Direxion NASDAQ-100® Equal Wtd ETF | |||
| ROAM | 22.53 | 0.11 | +0.49% |
| Hartford Multifactor Emerging Mkts ETF | |||
| ITOT | 128.03 | 0.28 | +0.22% |
| iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Mkt ETF | |||
| PIFI | 91.51 | N/A | N/A |
| ClearShares Piton Intdt Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| FYLD | 24.97 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
BFAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFAM | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| MCW - BFAM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| SABR - BFAM | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| TNL - BFAM | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.99% | ||
| MED - BFAM | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| EXPE - BFAM | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||