BFC
Price
$109.18
Change
-$2.98 (-2.66%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
839.24M
82 days until earnings call
FMBH
Price
$33.43
Change
-$0.59 (-1.73%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
759.93M
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFC vs FMBH

Header iconBFC vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs FMBHBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$109.18
Change-$2.98 (-2.66%)
Volume$20.14K
Capitalization839.24M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$33.43
Change-$0.59 (-1.73%)
Volume$57.56K
Capitalization759.93M
BFC vs FMBH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. FMBH commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Buy and FMBH is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BFC: $109.18 vs. FMBH: $33.43)
Brand notoriety: BFC and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 80% vs. FMBH: 86%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $839.24M vs. FMBH: $759.93M
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $839.24M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $759.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than BFC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($839M) has a higher market cap than FMBH($760M). BFC has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: BFC (11.37) vs FMBH (10.10). BFC YTD gains are higher at: 10.668 vs. FMBH (-8.634). BFC has more cash in the bank: 46.3M vs. FMBH (16.1M). BFC has less debt than FMBH: BFC (51.4M) vs FMBH (409M). FMBH has higher revenues than BFC: FMBH (275M) vs BFC (137M).
BFCFMBHBFC / FMBH
Capitalization839M760M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.668-8.634-124%
P/E Ratio11.3710.10113%
Revenue137M275M50%
Total Cash46.3M16.1M288%
Total Debt51.4M409M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3311
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1849
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1347
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFC's Valuation (87) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (98). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (49). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (11). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (58). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (47). This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUTX121.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Utilities
FBTDX103.20N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery C
STRAX30.28N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
FPCSX40.19N/A
N/A
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
GILIX18.99N/A
N/A
NAA Large Core Instl

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-1.73%
CTBI - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
PEBO - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
NWBI - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
TCBK - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
FFBC - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
More