BFC
Price
$101.55
Change
+$1.12 (+1.12%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
29 days until earnings call
NIC
Price
$106.01
Change
+$0.50 (+0.47%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFC vs NIC

Header iconBFC vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs NICBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$101.55
Change+$1.12 (+1.12%)
Volume$64.61K
CapitalizationN/A
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$106.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.47%)
Volume$112.45K
CapitalizationN/A
BFC vs NIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. NIC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BFC: $101.55 vs. NIC: $106.01)
Brand notoriety: BFC and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 354% vs. NIC: 192%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $839.24M vs. NIC: $1.25B
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $839.24M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the short-term than NIC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.91% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($1.25B) has a higher market cap than BFC($839M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than BFC: NIC (20.55) vs BFC (11.37). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 33.298 vs. BFC (18.732). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. BFC (46.3M). BFC has less debt than NIC: BFC (51.4M) vs NIC (167M). NIC has higher revenues than BFC: NIC (278M) vs BFC (137M).
BFCNICBFC / NIC
Capitalization839M1.25B67%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.73233.29856%
P/E Ratio11.3720.5555%
Revenue137M278M49%
Total Cash46.3M130M36%
Total Debt51.4M167M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2638
SMR RATING
1..100
2316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIC's Valuation (84) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (96). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (38). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (23). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (44). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (85). This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGCX51.520.60
+1.18%
Invesco Main Street C
PIEKX25.440.03
+0.12%
Pioneer International Equity K
RWCIX10.650.01
+0.09%
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity I
FBKFX16.07-0.01
-0.04%
Fidelity Balanced K6
HRIOX11.73-0.03
-0.26%
Hood River International Opp Instl