BFC
Price
$98.94
Change
+$1.40 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
839.24M
2 days until earnings call
PDLB
Price
$13.11
Change
-$0.08 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
204.6M
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFC vs PDLB

Header iconBFC vs PDLB Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs PDLBBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$98.94
Change+$1.40 (+1.44%)
Volume$16.21K
Capitalization839.24M
Ponce Financial Group
Price$13.11
Change-$0.08 (-0.61%)
Volume$36.68K
Capitalization204.6M
BFC vs PDLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. PDLB commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Hold and PDLB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BFC: $98.94 vs. PDLB: $13.11)
Brand notoriety: BFC and PDLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 92% vs. PDLB: 81%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $839.24M vs. PDLB: $204.6M
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $839.24M. PDLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $204.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePDLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PDLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than PDLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDLB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PDLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDLB is a better buy in the short-term than BFC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.57% price change this week, while PDLB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

PDLB is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($839M) has a higher market cap than PDLB($205M). PDLB has higher P/E ratio than BFC: PDLB (57.33) vs BFC (11.37). PDLB YTD gains are higher at: 0.846 vs. BFC (-0.151). BFC has less debt than PDLB: BFC (51.4M) vs PDLB (717M). BFC has higher revenues than PDLB: BFC (137M) vs PDLB (73.9M).
BFCPDLBBFC / PDLB
Capitalization839M205M409%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.1510.846-18%
P/E Ratio11.3757.3320%
Revenue137M73.9M185%
Total Cash46.3MN/A-
Total Debt51.4M717M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs PDLB: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
PDLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
2350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDLB's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (93). This means that PDLB’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDLB (100). This means that BFC’s stock grew significantly faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PDLB (50). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

PDLB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (49). This means that PDLB’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (91). This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCPDLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICPAX6.490.03
+0.46%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources A
HQIVX20.870.09
+0.43%
Hartford Equity Income R6
LVOFX20.180.05
+0.25%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
GGLCX10.040.02
+0.20%
Gabelli International Small Cap C
MASPX30.47N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Instl

PDLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDLB has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDLB jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDLB
1D Price
Change %
PDLB100%
-0.61%
RBCAA - PDLB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
FCBC - PDLB
67%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
FBIZ - PDLB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
BFC - PDLB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
THFF - PDLB
66%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More