Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFCCX vs PCNNX
BFCCX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts BFCCX vs PCNNX
American Funds Corporate Bond C
Price$9.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$8.96
Change-$0.03 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.39B
BFCCX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFCCX vs. PCNNX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFCCX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. BFCCX (1.93B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than BFCCX: PCNNX (4.39) vs BFCCX (3.16). BFCCX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: BFCCX (9 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). BFCCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than PCNNX (1.29). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. BFCCX (191.00). BFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: BFCCX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. BFCCX (2.04). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.60 vs. BFCCX (-12.86).
| BFCCX | PCNNX | BFCCX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.29 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.424 | 3.443 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 12.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 4.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 4.88 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.44 | 13.88 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.86 | -1.60 | 804% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers