Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFCCX vs PCNNX
BFCCX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts BFCCX vs PCNNX
American Funds Corporate Bond C
Price$9.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4B
BFCCX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFCCX vs. PCNNX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFCCX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. BFCCX (1.95B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than BFCCX: PCNNX (4.47) vs BFCCX (2.89). BFCCX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: BFCCX (9 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). BFCCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than PCNNX (1.29). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. BFCCX (191.00). BFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: BFCCX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. BFCCX (1.55). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.68 vs. BFCCX (-12.61).
| BFCCX | PCNNX | BFCCX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.29 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.264 | 5.243 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 12.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 4.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 4.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.88 | 13.50 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.61 | -1.68 | 753% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement