Ad is loading...
BFOCX vs CCIZX
BFOCX vs CCIZX Comparison
Open Charts BFOCX vs CCIZX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$121.30
Change+$3.23 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.06B
BFOCX vs CCIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOCX vs. CCIZX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOCX is a Buy and CCIZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. BFOCX (197M). BFOCX (0.00) and CCIZX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFOCX was incepted earlier than CCIZX: BFOCX (28 years) vs CCIZX (15 years). BFOCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). BFOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 2481.80 vs. CCIZX (39.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFOCX: CCIZX (2000) vs BFOCX (5000). BFOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. CCIZX (-12.22). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.32 vs. BFOCX (-19.01).
| BFOCX | CCIZX | BFOCX / CCIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.93 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.93 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.512 | -20.379 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 197M | 11.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | -12.22 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.89 | -1.45 | -199% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.01 | 49.32 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.17 | 87.35 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...