Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFOCX vs CCIZX
BFOCX vs CCIZX Comparison
Open Charts BFOCX vs CCIZX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$164.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.21B
BFOCX vs CCIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOCX vs. CCIZX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOCX is a Buy and CCIZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. BFOCX (310M). BFOCX (0.00) and CCIZX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFOCX was incepted earlier than CCIZX: BFOCX (28 years) vs CCIZX (15 years). BFOCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). BFOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 2481.80 vs. CCIZX (39.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFOCX: CCIZX (2000) vs BFOCX (5000). BFOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 86.79 vs. CCIZX (20.51). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. BFOCX (-6.54).
| BFOCX | CCIZX | BFOCX / CCIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.93 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.93 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.257 | 10.992 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 15.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 86.79 | 20.51 | 423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.52 | 37.95 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.54 | 63.20 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.98 | 160.84 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement