Advertisement
BFST vs FRAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFST is a Hold and FRAF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BFST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFST is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
FRAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.54% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BFST | FRAF | BFST / FRAF | |
| Capitalization | 550M | 113M | 487% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.336 | 30.637 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.38 | 8.33 | 101% |
| Revenue | 247M | 67.3M | 367% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 20.1M | - |
| Total Debt | 616M | 154M | 400% |
BFST | FRAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BFST's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (59). This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.
FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFST (47). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to BFST’s over the last 12 months.
FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFST (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFST’s over the last 12 months.
FRAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFST (45). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to BFST’s over the last 12 months.
FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFST (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than BFST’s over the last 12 months.
| BFST | FRAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 6 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 67% | 28 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
BFST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFST has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFST jumps, then BY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFST | 100% | -3.30% | ||
| BY - BFST | 88% Closely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| SSB - BFST | 87% Closely correlated | -4.32% | ||
| STEL - BFST | 87% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| BRKL - BFST | 87% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| TRMK - BFST | 86% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||
FRAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRAF | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| FUNC - FRAF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| MRBK - FRAF | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| WNEB - FRAF | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| FCCO - FRAF | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| CWBC - FRAF | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.59% | ||
More | ||||