Ad is loading...
BFTHX vs GFACX
BFTHX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs GFACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$47.85
Change+$0.65 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.21M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
BFTHX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BFTHX (610M). BFTHX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFTHX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BFTHX (21 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BFTHX (1.03). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BFTHX (13.38). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: GFACX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.19 vs. GFACX (-7.10). BFTHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.80 vs. GFACX (37.34).
| BFTHX | GFACX | BFTHX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.468 | -9.959 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.19 | -7.10 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.18 | 2.19 | 967% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.80 | 37.34 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.49 | 35.37 | 434% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...