Ad is loading...
BGAFX vs FNPFX
BGAFX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs FNPFX
Baron Global Advantage Retail
Price$34.92
Change+$3.21 (+10.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.79M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$58.70
Change+$4.29 (+7.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
BGAFX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. FNPFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. BGAFX (510M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: FNPFX (0.90) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: BGAFX (13 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). BGAFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGAFX (2.03). BGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: BGAFX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.44 vs. FNPFX (-9.42). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.25 vs. BGAFX (16.11).
| BGAFX | FNPFX | BGAFX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.41 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.083 | -12.383 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | -9.42 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.73 | -5.21 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.11 | 37.25 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers