Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCWX vs REEBX
BGCWX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCWX vs REEBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
Price$15.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.08M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$58.84
Change+$0.66 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.03B
BGCWX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCWX vs. REEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCWX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BGCWX (250M). BGCWX pays higher dividends than REEBX: BGCWX (3.74) vs REEBX (0.66). BGCWX was incepted earlier than REEBX: BGCWX (16 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than BGCWX (0.66). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCWX (23.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCWX: REEBX (250) vs BGCWX (25000000). BGCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. REEBX (5.03). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.44 vs. BGCWX (1.62).
| BGCWX | REEBX | BGCWX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.728 | 11.545 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 0.66 | 565% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 5.03 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.93 | 24.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.62 | 16.44 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.93 | 21.22 | 155% |