Ad is loading...
BGCWX vs REREX
BGCWX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts BGCWX vs REREX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
Price$15.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.6M
American Funds Europacific Growth R4
Price$56.07
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
BGCWX vs REREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCWX vs. REREX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCWX is a Buy and REREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. BGCWX (256M). BGCWX pays higher dividends than REREX: BGCWX (3.88) vs REREX (1.12). BGCWX was incepted earlier than REREX: BGCWX (15 years) vs REREX (23 years). REREX (0.82) is less costly to investors than BGCWX (0.63). REREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCWX (23.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCWX: REREX (250) vs BGCWX (25000000). BGCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. REREX (-0.82). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 25.58 vs. BGCWX (8.78).
| BGCWX | REREX | BGCWX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.249 | 7.188 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 1.12 | 345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | -0.82 | -440% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.78 | 20.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.78 | 25.58 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.12 | 16.25 | 148% |